Actually, unvoting nobody, voting Jonah.a.barnes. Invisible hand is definitely legit.
Also, there are three other reasons Jonah is guilty:
1) He isn't posting his "real" RPM, even though he's claiming the Dalek one is fake.
2) He didn't have the type of reaction an innocent person would have. If he was actually innocent, he would have been like "Um, what on earth? He totally made that up lol." Instead, he was like "Well, it's my word against his." Doesn't seem like the kind of thing an innocent person would say.
3) Additionally, he said "I don't know why he would make an evil RPM and send it to people or just tell people about it with the impression it is mine. That makes me very suspicious." LOL. That's not even close to what an innocent person would say. He wouldn't be merely "very suspicious" if this happened. He'd be 100% sure that Invisible Hand was guilty!
Besides, Invisible Hand's legit guys. Really. There's no way an rpm like that could be fake.
Who would post their real RPM in the topic for all to see? If that's counting against Jonah, then we ought also to count it against Invisible Hand.
As for the second, the question is whether he's thinking of himself in terms of "innocent" and "guilty." See, anyone can say "he made that up." If he were guilty, he would still be saying "he made that up." So either way, his comments are going to be taken with a grain of salt. So approaching it by saying "it's my word against his" is actually the logical step to take, because it's true whether he's innocent or guilty.
As for him being very suspicious, it's clearly an understatement. Understatement is a tool that can be used to show how obvious something is, as shown here. Admittedly, it may have worked better if he had made the understatement a bit stronger. For example, "That makes me a bit suspicious. You know, not too
suspicious, but just a tad. Something to think about." But regardless of how it was done, it still looks like understatement to me.
Now, maybe Jonah is guilty. But are we taking Invisible Hand's side just because it was the first post? If Jonah had made that accusation about Invisible Hand first, would we be taking his side instead? After all, neither of them is willing to post their real RPM, and why would they?
See, we don't have enough evidence to kill either of them right now. While I'm rather new to HSD, past mafia games with actual cards have made me rather cautious about killing people without sufficient evidence. And bear this in mind. In mafia games that are played in person, somebody dies every night. The mafia must kill. Here, nobody died. It looks to me like the mafia in this game are either incompetent, or clumsy, or forgetful, or something of that nature. (No offense to whoever the mafia are. Please don't kill me. Everybody makes mistakes.) The point is, because nobody died, we won't be losing anything or falling behind if we don't lynch somebody. We'll just be waiting for more evidence. If nobody dies again, we may have to take a chance. But for now, it seems risky to accuse one or the other just because one of them refused to give his RPM before the other one did.
-Superstars111, Grand Master of Nerdiness
The Wookiee who Wouldn't Die