This press was somewhat simpler under last year's resolution, since "system" was explicitly stated.
This year, the press goes something like this:
Reforming the UN itself requires that we alter something about the organization
as defined by [insert favorite source here]. If the resolution is that my car should be significantly reformed (or abolished), then upgrading the engine or converting my diesel truck into a hybrid
would both uphold that resolution. But changing where my car is going wouldn't significantly reform the car.
In the same way, it would significantly reform the UN to implement weighted voting within the General Assembly. Reforming the Convention on the Rights of a Child alters a treaty that has already gone through the UN. A past
action (which, btw, would have to be re-ratified by the nations in order to become law). So not only are we dealing with a policy of the UN which does not substantially affect its operations, we are dealing with something that's not even under its enforceable jurisdiction.
I think it would be more appropriate to say "policy v. organization' or 'policy v. operational reform'. The UN system includes various organizations which are affiliated with, but not under the direct authority of, the UN.
Guys. John Bush III is coaching this club. In Greek, jonbush means SIGN UP NOW.Join Speech and Debate USA[Avatar photo credit]